What is Wet / Vapor Abrasive Blasting
Wet Abrasive Blasting Compared to Sand Blasting
Wet abrasive blasting (also known as vapor abrasive blasting) removes coatings, contaminants, corrosion and residues from hard surfaces. It’s similar to dry sand blasting, except that the blast media is moistened prior to impacting the surface.
The main advantage of vapor abrasive blasting over sand blasting is that it reduces dust, allowing for operators to work in a wide range of environments with minimal setup and cleanup costs. It results in a cleaner, more consistent finished, ready to coat, with no embedded particles or clinging dust.
Vapor abrasive blasting is alternatively referred to as wet blasting, wet abrasive blasting, vapor blasting, slurry blasting, wet sandblasting and dustless blasting.
Vapor Abrasive / Wet Abrasive Blasting Methods
WIN And Halo Nozzles
Nozzles are extensions for sandblasters that provide some dust suppression.
Water Injection Nozzles (WIN): Jets of water dampen abrasive as it leaves the nozzle.
Halo (water ring) nozzles: A curtain of water surrounds the abrasive blast, dampening dust after impact.
Pros: Relatively inexpensive. Suppresses 50-85% of dust*.
Cons: High water consumption.
Cabinets And Blast Rooms
Water and media are mixed and sprayed inside an enclosure. An efficient way to blast parts.
Pros: Allows for media recycling, built-in containment.
Cons: Stationary. Blasting limitied to objects that can fit in the enclosure.
Water and abrasive is stored in a pot under air pressure. The mixture is drawn into the airflow using the venturi effect.
Pros: Effective dust suppression.
Cons: Limited flow control. High abrasive and water consumption.
Vapor Abrasive Blasters
Water and abrasive are combined in a pot under water pressure, then injected into the airflow.
Pros: up to 95% dust suppression. Affords fine control over the air pressure and water/abrasive mixture, allowing for blasting of a wider range of surfaces and reducing the amount of media and water expended.
Media & Abrasives
Media refers to materials that do not create a surface profile upon impact. These include both inorganic and organic materials. Abrasives include any blast material that creates a surface profile (or anchor pattern) upon impact. Surface coatings adhere more strongly to profiled surfaces.
What Happens On Impact
When abrasive impacts a hard surface, the particle often breaks or shatters, propelling finer particles into the air as dust, in addition to dust already present in the dry media. This impact can also cause dry sparks charged with static electricity.
When wet abrasive impacts a surface, fine particles are sequestered in water droplets. The additional water weighs the particles down, preventing dust.
The presence of water also confers more mass on the particle at impact. As the water droplet disperses, the hydrostatic force blasts away surface coating, leaving a feathered edge around the perimeter for seamless recoatings.
Wet/Abrasive Blasting Applications
Wet abrasive blasting can substitute for sandblasting for virtually any application, but there are surfaces, conditions and environments for which wet blasting is especially advantageous.
Alongside Other Workers
Dust from dry blasting presents not only an inhalation health hazard, but severely limits visibility. Whereas dry blasting operations must be sequestered from normal operations, wet blasters can work in close proximity with other workers with minimal precautionary measures.
Dry blasting can cast dry sparks charged with static electricity which can lead to explosions in the presence of flammable gases. Wet blasting does not completely eliminate sparks, but when sparks occur they are cold sparks (without static electricity), minimizing the explosive potential.
Wet blasters can operate effectively at lower PSI, removing coatings without damaging the underlying substrate. Vapor abrasive blasting is a preferred method for blasting antique, fragile surfaces and soft surfaces (including wood). In addition, the presence of lubricating water reduces heat due to friction that can warp metal surfaces.
Dry blasting requires substantial containment/tenting to maintain airborne dust levels within legal limits. In outdoor and urban environments, such containment is not practical or cost-effective. Due to inherent dust suppression, vapor abrasive blasting operations require minimal containment.
History Of Wet Blasting
In 1950, sandblasting was banned in Britain due to concerns over silicosis, an occupational hazard associated with inhalation of silica dust. Shortly after, Norman Ashworth invented the first vapor abrasive blaster there.
In 1966, several European nations followed suit and banned sandblasting, leading to innovation of new wet blasting technologies, notably in Germany, where the first mobile wet blaster was invented, designed explicitly to compete with sandblasters.
Adoption In North America
Wet blasters were imported to North America from Germany in the 90's and Britain in the 00's. In 2009, the first domestically-manufactured vapor abrasive blasters – Ecoquip and GeoBlaster – entered the market. In 2013 and 2014 respectively, Ecoquip and GeoBlaster were acquired by Graco Inc., a worldwide leader in fluid handling.
With industry-standard parts that can be sourced locally and improved efficiency due to technological innovations, vapor abrasive blasters are experiencing widespread adoption in the surface preparation industry.
Silica Comparison Wet vs. Dry Blasting
Graco retained a third party to perform an Industrial Hygiene Survey in order to evaluate potential exposures to respirable airborne dust and respirable silica during blasting
Corrosion Protection Part 2: CleanWirx and EcoQuip
Together, vapor abrasive blast cleaning and CleanWirx provide a particularly strong combination in surface preparation
Corrosion Protection Part 1: Intro to CleanWirx
A thoroughly cleaned surface virtually free from surface contaminants leads to improved coating adhesion and reduced likelihood of corrosion