Optimizing the manufacturing process is key to increasing productivity
For many industrial manufacturing applications, defining an efficient and effective manufacturing process is often the key factor in achieving profitability. Process engineers invest significant time and resources on testing and refinements to arrive at an optimized process with improved quality.
Standardization to achieve ISO compliance and maintain a lean manufacturing approach is commonplace in the automotive industry. Once a process is defined, altering or changing it during production is a very bad idea.
End-of-line packaging within ISO and lean manufacturing
The desire to achieve ISO 9000 or 9001 certifications has ultimately driven many industries to define their manufacturing process and stick to it. These certifications do not focus on exactly what the process should be. They are simply vehicles for documenting the process and then using that documentation for monitoring purposes to ensure manufacturers maintain the quality of the product.
When plants implement lean manufacturing methods, the focus is on eliminating waste to improve efficiencies and reduce pricing, ultimately providing added value to their customers.
Due to variables beyond their control, quality managers have given little focus to developing a lean or optimized end-of-line packaging process.
Antiquated technology & lean manufacturing
Lean manufacturing initiatives tend not to include end-of-line packaging applications, largely because there is no way to optimize the process due to the limited system capabilities. Antiquated tank-based melting and gear-driven pump technology make it virtually impossible to standardize a process.
Since older hot melt systems melt adhesive with a heated tank, it is very difficult to maintain consistent adhesive temperature. The glue near the outside of these tanks heats up quicker and will start to deteriorate as the glue near the center of the tank reaches temperature.
Using tank-based hot melt systems ultimately creates a constant adjustment battle
It is commonly understood that line operators have to continuously adjust system settings to achieve desired results. This inconsistency ultimately diminishes the ability to achieve overall process control. Being able to “set and forget” the hot melt system is impossible, as the first shift operator’s settings are often different from those on the third shift.
Alternative adhesives help address material inconsistencies
In addition to hot melt system technology, a better understanding of hot melt adhesive materials can provide insight to help engineers achieve an optimized end-of-line packaging process. Hot melt adhesive has four components:
1) Base Compounds: the backbone or core of the adhesive, imparting properties like mechanical strength, flexibility, and end-use properties such as heat, cold, and chemical resistance. In most cases, base adhesive will not be used alone.
2) Tackifiers: these impart hot tack or the relative stickiness of the adhesive. The tackifier used depends on the specific adhesion properties required for a particular substrate and typically determines the colour and characteristic odor of a particular hot melt adhesive.
3) Dilutants: waxes or oils that modify the adhesive’s viscosity and set speed, also known as set time.
4) Stabilizers: added in recent years to provide viscosity stability and help overcome charring of adhesive sitting in heated tanks over long periods of time.
Quality control & performance
A standardized process means all these components are closely controlled during the melting, transfer, and dispense applications. The end goal is to match the hot melt adhesive’s properties to the performance requirements.
With the typical tank-based hot melt technology, glue consistency is constantly in flux. This situation has just been accepted as part of end-of-line packaging applications, along with glue degradation and dealing with adhesive char within the hot melt system.
To help address adhesive charring and consistency issues, manufacturers turned to material suppliers to develop alternative hot melt adhesives such as metallocenes. They tend to clog less, have better temperature stability, and work over a wider temperature range. However, these adhesive options are more costly for manufacturers, ultimately minimizing profitability.
Quality through improved technology
Hot melt adhesive systems that utilize newer adhesive melting chambers (no heated tanks or reservoirs with fins) are truly Tank-FreeTM systems. Since they melt adhesive on a “first-in, first-out” basis, these systems are able to maintain a consistent adhesive temperature, avoiding the deterioration of adhesive. That means there is no reason to change any settings after the process has been optimized. Hot melt system reliability is achieved and the same amount of adhesive is applied every time.
With greater control and the ability to monitor hot melt adhesive dispense, operators are now able to realize an optimized process and deliver the highest efficiencies possible.
By standardizing end-of-line packaging and case and carton sealing processes, manufacturers are finally able to achieve a controlled and safe process, implement lean manufacturing methods, and ultimately achieve profitability goals.
Depending on the application, operators using true Tank-FreeTM hot melt systems can go a year or more without changing settings or even touching the system.